Vortex Gaming

· Starting the opening of a super special same type package with a 0.7% chance.
· Expressing anxiety about the results despite the high odds and hesitating to open.
· Both individuals eventually give up and proceed with the opening.

· The package being opened costs 150 points, with a high base price of 5.5 billion BP, not the usual 1.5 billion BP.
· The high price is analyzed as a consequence of the low probability.
· Encouraging other users to open packages and expressing anticipation for acquiring high-priced players.

· Questioning the account status and probabilities, predicting 'calm waves' if a legendary player appears.
· Mentioning the absence of a specific player (Raul) and joking about making any player expensive, even if it means adding zeros, if the desired player doesn't appear.
· Humorously expressing expectations with the phrase 'plus zero'.

· Cheering after acquiring TOTS Mbappe, but questioning why the player is German.
· Expressing surprise that it's the same player as the previously pulled 8 million BP player and that the price is a low 4.5 million BP.
· Recognizing that this is not a good pull and requesting a check to see if the probabilities were applied correctly.

· Strongly suspecting a probability discrepancy due to getting a 36th ranked, i.e., lower-tier player.
· Expressing confusion as the results are poor despite the stated 2.5% probability.
· Raising suspicions of system errors or probability manipulation and demanding accurate analysis and verification.

· Briefly experiencing confusion and denial despite not getting the desired outcome.
· Describing the other person's reaction as 'losing their mind' and observing the situation with distrust in the system.
· Expressing regret and disappointment over the poor results despite the same probabilities.

· Attempting one last opening to check the difference between the current package and the same type package.
· Stating that the frequency and value of this package will be determined by the outcome of this opening.
· Mentioning that if the result is poor again, it will be realized that the previous opening was a big mistake.

· Confirming that the opened package is not a same type package, but a different type that provides both 11 cards and 10 cards.
· An argument ensues, with one person claiming the other pulled a rare same type package.
· Claims diverge, leading to a dispute over rights, but eventually acknowledging it belongs to someone else.

· A viewer shares an example of acquiring a 130 million BP player and a main package from a 150-point package.
· This result was achieved after being inspired by the broadcast and trying it themselves, for which they express gratitude.
· Analyzing that the player cards acquired by other viewers are worth 2.1 billion BP and 2 billion BP, which is a decent return on investment.
· Analyzing that the player cards acquired by other viewers are worth 2.1 billion BP and 2 billion BP, which is a decent return on investment.

· Comparing it to the experience of pulling 2.4 billion BP, acquiring players worth over 2 billion BP is considered a satisfactory result.
· Stating that the card belongs to a high-tier pool and yielded good results.
· However, once again expressing disappointment over the lack of good results from the 'same type package' opened earlier.