Post

FC Online Chelsea squad player review and recommendations (Bangbae-woo) Bangbae shares his review of the players he used while building a Chelsea squad in FC Online. He provides detailed explanations of each player's strengths and weaknesses, price-to-performance ratio, and tips for utilization, offering helpful information for building a Chelsea squad.
1. Vidic Eto'o +5 & Torres Player Review
00:00 - 01:38
Vidic Eto'o (+5): - Has the advantage of being two-footed, but the price-to-performance ratio is disappointing. - Decent for penetration plays, but may be disappointing for various play styles. - Weak physique makes it difficult to compete with defenders. Torres: - Mid-range shooting ability has improved, but physical strength is weak compared to his physique. - Feels clunky and the controls aren't great. - Passing play is very disappointing.
2. Barkley Player Review
01:39 - 03:11
Barkley (+5): - Average as a defensive midfielder, but has the advantage of being two-footed and having good physicals. - Better than Lampard as a defensive midfielder. - Tackle success rate and controls are better than Lampard. - Mid-range shooting is attractive. - Low defensive stats make AI defending disappointing.
3. Essien & Fabregas Player Review
03:12 - 05:15
Essien: - Used to compensate for Barkley's lack of defensive ability. - Gives the most Essien-like feel compared to existing Essien cards. - Few passing mistakes and gives a smooth passing feel. - Compensates for the low vision of existing cards. - Satisfactory performance for the salary. Fabregas: - Good passing, shooting, and curve stats, and decent movement. - Dribbling feels disappointing, and the speed isn't fast. - Low balance and weak physical strength. - Can be used as a winger, central midfielder, or second striker.
4. Gullit & Salah Player Review
05:16 - 08:06
Gullit (+8): - Excellent physicals, feel, passing, heading, and finishing. - Can be used as a striker. - Worth the high price. Salah: - Best Chelsea winger (Goat). - Excellent physicals, feel, shooting, and curve. - Has an advantage in physical battles against most fullbacks. - The only downside is that he may be criticized by Chelsea fans.
5. Pedro & Christensen Player Review
08:07 - 09:57
Pedro (GR +5): - Stamina has been improved, and mid-range shooting isn't bad. - Good feel and two-footed crosses are an advantage. - ZD shots go in well compared to his stats. - Average price-to-performance ratio. Christensen: - Stats aren't bad, but the price-to-performance ratio is disappointing. - Doesn't push with his body, and physical strength is weak. - Tackle accuracy is disappointing.
6. Azpilicueta, Rudiger & Ake Player Review
09:58 - 12:21
Azpilicueta: - Not bad as a center back, but the physical strength of the partner center back is important. - Weak against cross meta, and difficult to control the center back cursor. - Good value for money, but doesn't fit the current meta. Rudiger: - Best Chelsea center back. - Excellent in all aspects such as controls, duels, and heading. - Very expensive. Ake: - Most average Chelsea center back. - Running, feel, physical strength, and dueling stats are average. - A good choice when it's difficult to use expensive center backs or when you're uncomfortable with short center backs.
7. Carvalho, Desailly, Petit, Hazard, Pulisic, Lampard Player Review
12:22 - 15:07
Carvalho: - Agile and feels strong in physical battles. - Recommended as a center back. Desailly: - Doesn't show the same performance as before. - Carvalho is a better choice. Pettit: - Good left-footed mid-range shot, but weak foot 3 is annoying. - Recommended for users who are not bothered by the weak foot. Hazard: - From the reviews I've seen, he's solid and quick. - Worth using if you can afford the high price. Pulisic: - Seems good to use as a +5. Lampard: - One trick pony: shooting.
FC온라인피파4첼시선수후기방배우