Post
In-depth analysis of the pet probability controversy in a game heavily reliant on luck, and pointing out the problems with compensation
Criticizes the controversy over the pet gacha probability error in a game that relies heavily on luck, and the inadequate compensation policy, urging the provision of a reasonable compensation plan that users can be satisfied with.
1. 🎮 Game Heavily Reliant on Luck, Background of Pet Gacha Probability Controversy
- ✅ Issue arises regarding pet gacha in 111% company's game heavily reliant on luck
- ✅ Similar issue occurred in the past with Random Dice, but it was buried due to the small scale of the game
- ✅ This time, communication channels such as the official cafe are in place, so users' complaints are being expressed
00:01 - 00:35
1. 🎮 Game Heavily Reliant on Luck, Background of Pet Gacha Probability Controversy
- ✅ Issue arises regarding pet gacha in 111% company's game heavily reliant on luck
- ✅ Similar issue occurred in the past with Random Dice, but it was buried due to the small scale of the game
- ✅ This time, communication channels such as the official cafe are in place, so users' complaints are being expressed
00:36 - 02:58
2. 💰 Pet System and Pay-to-Win Inducement, and the Core of the Problem
- ✅ Pet gacha is currently the content with the most spending in the game heavily reliant on luck
- ✅ Stats such as attack power and critical hit rate can be improved through the rune system and pet overall level
- ✅ In particular, the Drago pet is popular due to its critical hit rate increase effect
- ⚠️ A lot of money is going into the pet system, but there is a problem with the pet gacha probability
02:59 - 04:50
3. 📊 Analysis of Probability Error Acknowledgment and Announcement Content
- ✅ Acknowledged bias error where a specific pet (Whale King) appears excessively
- ✅ Confirmed the existence of the same error in the rune gacha system (specific runes not appearing)
- ✅ Unlike past cases of ignoring probability issues, this time they are facing strong backlash from users
- ✅ Users are demanding probability disclosure and transparent operation
04:51 - 07:49
4. 🎁 Pointing Out Problems: Detailed Analysis of Inadequate Compensation Policy
- ✅ Resource compensation for runestone consumption is scheduled to be paid immediately
- ⚠️ Pet compensation selection ticket provided (choose 1 out of 3 options)
- ❌ Option 1: Collect all pets and refund batteries → Existing high-level pets disappear
- ❌ Option 2: Evenly distribute pet quantities → Difficult to acquire desired pets, induces additional spending
- ❌ Option 3: Maintain current state → Virtually no compensation
| 보상 옵션 | 내용 | 문제점 |
|---|---|---|
| Pet Collection and Refund | Collect all pets, refund batteries | High-level pets disappear, burden of re-gacha |
| Pet Quantity Distribution | Evenly distribute pet quantities | Impossible to acquire desired pets, induces additional spending |
| Maintain Current State | Maintain current state as is | No practical compensation |
07:50 - 09:29
5. 📢 Criticizing Compensation Policy that Ignores User Opinions
- ❌ Criticizing the lack of full refund for the amount spent on pets
- ❌ Simply distributing evenly is insufficient to solve the problem
- ✅ Full refund of the amount invested in pets and pet level reset is reasonable
- ⚠️ Pointing out the attitude of trying to resolve the issue without incurring losses
09:30 - 12:19
6. 🙏 Urging Correct Compensation and Request to 111% Company
- ✅ Urging a change to compensation that users can be satisfied with (full refund of pet amount)
- ✅ Acknowledging and improving on mistakes can prevent recurrence of the same errors
- ✅ Need to restore public sentiment with proper compensation
- ✅ Expressing regret as a long-time player of the game and emphasizing trust in 111%