Post
FC Mobile: F2P Heel-to-Heel 5-Star Striker Pizarro Review! How's his performance?
Youngmiter uses Pizarro, a 5-star heel-to-heel striker who can be acquired by free-to-play users in the new season of FC Mobile, and analyzes his performance. While he has the advantage of being free, he is considered somewhat disappointing to buy directly.
1. 🤔 Questions about the new 5-star striker Pizarro
- ✅ Youngmiter expresses curiosity about the new season's 5-star striker, Pizarro, and starts the review
- ✅ Expresses anticipation for Pizarro's performance, who has 5-star skills and high/low skills
00:00 - 00:13
1. 🤔 Questions about the new 5-star striker Pizarro
- ✅ Youngmiter expresses curiosity about the new season's 5-star striker, Pizarro, and starts the review
- ✅ Expresses anticipation for Pizarro's performance, who has 5-star skills and high/low skills
00:14 - 00:32
2. 🎁 Challenging the 20 billion BP draw! And acquiring Pizarro
- ✅ The process of acquiring Pizarro through drawing
- ✅ Luckily gets Pizarro quickly
00:33 - 00:49
3. 🧐 Pizarro player information and comparison with other players
- ✅ Mentions Pizarro's weak foot 4 and 5-star skill stats
- ✅ Tries to find Pizarro's strengths by comparing him with other strikers such as Captain Bape and Van Persie
00:50 - 01:25
4. ⚽️ Pizarro's practical test begins: Expectation for finishing ability
- ✅ Decides to use Pizarro, who viewers can get for free
- ✅ Expresses anticipation for Pizarro's finishing ability in particular
- ✅ Raises expectations by mentioning a friend who used to shout 'Eternal Lewandowski' and praised Pizarro
01:26 - 02:03
5. 🛠️ Team placement and activation of level 2 badge
- ✅ Places Pizarro in the team and activates the level 2 badge
- ✅ Reveals that he will play without much expectation for performance for fun
02:04 - 02:46
6. 📊 Pizarro's stat analysis: Lack of agility is a disadvantage
- ✅ Analyzes Pizarro's stats in detail
- ✅ Mentions stats such as speed, finishing, shooting power, long-range shooting, positioning, dribbling, heading, and jumping
- ✅ Points out that agility is particularly lacking
- ✅ Introduces his history of playing for Chelsea, Mihen, and Bremen, and mentions the possibility of using him in the Mihen style
02:47 - 03:25
7. 🎮 Pizarro play review: Disappointing feel
- ✅ Evaluates the feel of playing Pizarro directly
- ✅ The step-over is disappointing, but the shot is good
- ✅ Overall, the feel is not good
03:26 - 04:00
8. 🤕 Pizarro heading ability evaluation: Disappointing
- ✅ Tests Pizarro's heading ability
- ✅ Praised Pizarro's heading skills in the past, but now it's disappointing
- ✅ Unlike the first half, he doesn't look good in the second half
04:01 - 04:25
9. 👀 Attempting no-look pass and header
- ✅ Attempting a no-look pass
- ✅ Scene of scoring a goal with a header
04:26 - 05:22
10. 💪 Praising physical and positioning ability
- ✅ Suggests that Pizarro's positioning ability is good, but the cursor is not easy to catch
- ✅ Praises Pizarro's good physique and ability to hold out until the end
- ✅ Mentions that left-footed shots go in well and announces that he will try a 142-rated player
05:23 - 05:56
11. 🛡️ Defense ability and rank match potential test preview
- ✅ Pizarro blocks the path well and holds up better than expected
- ✅ Wonders if it will work in rank matches and previews the test
05:57 - 06:23
12. 🤔 Re-emphasizing disappointment in header ability
- ✅ Mentions again that the header is disappointing
- ✅ Evaluates that the jumping stat goes up, but it doesn't connect well with the header
06:24 - 07:00
13. 🆚 Comparison with Klose: Difference in header ability
- ✅ Evaluates that the physique is similar to Klose, but the header ability is lower than Klose
- ✅ Analyzes that Klose wins headers after a body fight, while Pizarro does not win headers well in competition
07:01 - 07:30
14. ⚖️ Overall evaluation: Shooting is good, but overall ambiguous
- ✅ Opinion that the feel is disappointing compared to Chronicle Torres
- ✅ Finishing and shooting power are good, but it is positive that even weak feet go in well
- ✅ Concludes that it is an ambiguous card overall, except for shooting
07:31 - 08:11
15. 💰 Recommended for free-to-play users, not recommended for paid users
- ✅ Evaluates that it is slow and ambiguous overall, but it is worth using if you get it for free
- ✅ Mentions that weak foot 4 and 5-star skills are a merit
- ✅ However, the opinion is that it is ambiguous to buy with your own money
- ✅ Concludes the video by saying that if you got it for free, try it, but you don't have to buy it and use it