Post
LG Gram Pro 2026: Intel vs AMD, which model should you choose? (Panther Lake vs Gorgon Point)
A comparative analysis of the Intel (Panther Lake) and AMD (Gorgon Point) CPU versions of the 2026 LG Gram Pro model, explaining the differences in various aspects such as display, performance, heat generation, noise, gaming performance, price, and NPU utilization, and providing an optimal selection guide.
1. 💻 Introduction to LG Gram Pro 2026 and Lineup Overview
- ✅ LG Gram Pro 2026 AMD CPU-equipped model review (sponsored)
- ✅ LG Gram lineup: Pro, regular Gram, Gram Book
- ✅ Gram Pro: Suitable for high-performance tasks, high price range
- ✅ Segmentation within the Pro lineup: External graphics, integrated graphics, 360-degree touch model
- ✅ Integrated graphics Pro model: Intel Panther Lake, AMD Gorgon Point
00:00 - 00:16
1. 💻 Introduction to LG Gram Pro 2026 and Lineup Overview
- ✅ LG Gram Pro 2026 AMD CPU-equipped model review (sponsored)
- ✅ LG Gram lineup: Pro, regular Gram, Gram Book
- ✅ Gram Pro: Suitable for high-performance tasks, high price range
- ✅ Segmentation within the Pro lineup: External graphics, integrated graphics, 360-degree touch model
- ✅ Integrated graphics Pro model: Intel Panther Lake, AMD Gorgon Point
00:17 - 01:48
2. 📈 RAM Price Increase Factors Analysis and Current Purchase Strategy
- ✅ Laptop prices rising in tandem with rising prices of components such as RAM and SSDs
- ⚠️ Rapid increase in RAM demand due to increased AI usage
- ⚠️ RAM manufacturers focusing on high-bandwidth memory production
- ✅ Decrease in general RAM supply and price increase
- ✅ Current purchase timing: Possibility of price stabilization or further increase
01:49 - 02:46
3. 🖥️ Display Panel Comparison: OLED (Intel) vs IPS LCD (AMD)
- ✅ Intel Panther Lake model: Equipped with OLED panel (high contrast ratio, advantageous for video editing)
- ✅ AMD Gorgon Point model: Equipped with IPS LCD anti-glare panel (reduces eye strain during long document work)
- ✅ Resolution: OLED (2880x1800, WQXGA+), LCD (WQXGA)
- ✅ Refresh rate: Intel (120Hz variable), AMD (144Hz variable)
| Item | Intel (OLED) | AMD (LCD) |
|---|---|---|
| sRGB | 100% | 100% |
| DCI-P3 | 100% | 99% |
| Adobe RGB | 92% | 89% |
| Maximum Brightness | 366nit | 428nit |
02:47 - 04:16
4. 🚀 Performance Comparison: Intel Arc Graphics vs AMD Radeon Graphics
- ✅ Intel Panther Lake: Equipped with next-generation Arc graphics, significantly improved performance compared to the previous generation (equivalent to external graphics 4050 level)
- ✅ AMD Gorgon Point: Equipped with Radeon 860M integrated graphics
- ⚠️ Absolute computational figures: AMD < Intel
- ✅ Benchmark score: Intel superior in multi-core score
- ✅ Time Spy score: Intel Arc Graphics > AMD Radeon Graphics
- ✅ PCMark 10 score: High essential and productivity scores, digital content creation score is lower than Intel but close to perfect score
04:17 - 05:28
5. 🌡️ Heat Generation and Noise Comparison: Emphasis on AMD's Efficiency
- ✅ CPU temperature: AMD (69-70 degrees) < Intel (around 90 degrees, under the same conditions)
- ✅ External heat generation: Keyboard and palm rest heat generation measured lower on Intel
- ✅ Power consumption: AMD (31W) < Intel (43W)
- ✅ Fan noise (maximum): AMD (37-38dB) < Intel (48dB)
- ✅ AMD Gorgon Point: Low power consumption, efficient performance
- ✅ Intel: High power consumption, high performance
- ✅ High performance: Intel, Efficiency: AMD
- ✅ LG Gram: Excellent heat and noise control even in a thin and light form factor
05:29 - 06:29
6. 🎮 Game Performance Test: Casual Games vs Triple A Games
- ✅ League of Legends: Very high settings, around 110 frames
- ✅ Valorant: High settings, average 150-160 frames
- ✅ Overwatch: Native quality, highest options (28 frames), option adjustment required
- ✅ Battlegrounds: Full HD Plus resolution, very low options (50-60 frames)
- ✅ Intel Arc Graphics: Average 55 frames in Battlegrounds Ultra options
- ⚠️ AMD: Difficult to run Triple A games
- ✅ Casual games (LoL, Valorant): Playable comfortably
06:30 - 07:01
7. 🎬 Video Editing Performance and Final Performance Summary
- ✅ Premiere Pro: Video editing possible without stuttering
- ✅ 4K video extraction (27 minutes 45 seconds): Took 23 minutes 4 seconds (AMD)
- ✅ High-spec games, high-spec video editing: Intel
- ✅ Casual work: AMD
07:02 - 07:42
8. 💰 Price Comparison and Additional Options to Consider
- ✅ Intel CPU (Panther Lake): 3,050,400 won based on 512GB
- ✅ AMD CPU (Ryzen 7 AI 450): 2,771,400 won
- ✅ Price difference: Approximately 280,000 won
- ✅ Additional options: SSD capacity upgrade (512GB -> 1TB, additional 176,700 won)
- ✅ Can consider regular LG Gram instead of Gram Pro
07:43 - 08:33
9. 🧠 NPU Utilization and Future Prospects
- ✅ Meets Microsoft Copilot Plus PC standard (40 TOPS)
- ✅ NPU may not be noticeable now, but can be used in practice
- ✅ Windows Recall function (AI-based document, web page search, MPU required)
- ✅ Local AI operation (Chat GPT, image generation, etc., MPU performance is important)
- ✅ Video conferencing function (background blur, eye contact correction, noise cancellation, MPU dedicated)
- ✅ MPU performance: Investment for the future
08:34 - 09:30
10. ✨ LG Gram Pro 2026 Final Evaluation and Closing
- ✅ LG Gram Pro 2026: Satisfied with design, performance, and AI functions
- ✅ CPU selection: Preference difference, high product completeness
- ✅ Balance of display, heat generation, weight, and AI functions
- ✅ Laptop market: Performance upgrade, disappointing price increase