Post
Bungie's first Marathon ban, at the center of controversy: Did past actions trip them up?The first permanent ban in Bungie's new game 'Marathon' is causing a stir in the community. The player claimed to have been banned without explanation, but a history of severe Code of Conduct violations in 'Destiny 2' has come to light, sparking a heated debate about Bungie's terms of service application and the scope of bans.
1. 🎮 First Permanent Ban in Marathon and Player's Claims
· The first permanent ban in Bungie's new game 'Marathon' has occurred, sparking controversy.
· The banned player claimed to have been permanently banned without explanation, despite streaming daily for two weeks, investing 200 hours in playtests, and 100 hours in server slams.
· The player expressed dissatisfaction, stating that this action was similar to what they experienced in 'Destiny 2'.
· The player's tweet quickly spread, garnering over 1.1 million views on Twitter.
· The banned player claimed to have been permanently banned without explanation, despite streaming daily for two weeks, investing 200 hours in playtests, and 100 hours in server slams.
· The player expressed dissatisfaction, stating that this action was similar to what they experienced in 'Destiny 2'.
· The player's tweet quickly spread, garnering over 1.1 million views on Twitter.
00:00 - 01:11
1. 🎮 First Permanent Ban in Marathon and Player's Claims
· The first permanent ban in Bungie's new game 'Marathon' has occurred, sparking controversy.
· The banned player claimed to have been permanently banned without explanation, despite streaming daily for two weeks, investing 200 hours in playtests, and 100 hours in server slams.
· The player expressed dissatisfaction, stating that this action was similar to what they experienced in 'Destiny 2'.
· The player's tweet quickly spread, garnering over 1.1 million views on Twitter.
· The banned player claimed to have been permanently banned without explanation, despite streaming daily for two weeks, investing 200 hours in playtests, and 100 hours in server slams.
· The player expressed dissatisfaction, stating that this action was similar to what they experienced in 'Destiny 2'.
· The player's tweet quickly spread, garnering over 1.1 million views on Twitter.
01:12 - 04:09
2. 🚨 Past Destiny 2 Ban History and Detailed Reasons
· According to Twitter community notes, the player had a history of being permanently banned in 'Destiny 2' for violating Bungie's Code of Conduct.
· The Bungie Germany account stated that the player was banned for persistent harassment of 'players, other creators, and Bungie employees'.
· Publicly revealed chat screenshots included extreme insults and threatening remarks such as 'Kill yourself', 'I hope your family explodes', and 'Useless human being'.
· The player explained that they acted this way out of anger due to being matched with cheaters at the time, but this was deemed unacceptable behavior.
· The Bungie Germany account stated that the player was banned for persistent harassment of 'players, other creators, and Bungie employees'.
· Publicly revealed chat screenshots included extreme insults and threatening remarks such as 'Kill yourself', 'I hope your family explodes', and 'Useless human being'.
· The player explained that they acted this way out of anger due to being matched with cheaters at the time, but this was deemed unacceptable behavior.
| Violation Details | Detailed Explanation |
|---|---|
| Code of Conduct Violation | Persistent harassment of players, other creators, and Bungie employees |
| Chat Content | 'Kill yourself', 'I hope your family explodes', 'Useless human being', and other extreme insults and threats |
04:10 - 09:11
3. ⚖️ Contradiction in Bungie's Terms and 'Ban Evasion' Controversy
· Bungie's official terms of service state that 'a player who has been restricted/banned in one game will not be restricted/banned in another game unless the restriction/ban applies to that game'.
· According to these terms, if there were no separate violations in 'Marathon', a 'Destiny 2' ban leading to a 'Marathon' ban contradicts the terms.
· Community notes pointed out that since 'Marathon' also uses Bungie login, the player attempted 'ban evasion'.
· However, the player claimed they did not create a new account and that it might have taken time for Bungie's security system to update.
· Some speculate that Bungie may have applied a 'Bungie-wide ban' to permanently exclude the player from all Bungie games.
· According to these terms, if there were no separate violations in 'Marathon', a 'Destiny 2' ban leading to a 'Marathon' ban contradicts the terms.
· Community notes pointed out that since 'Marathon' also uses Bungie login, the player attempted 'ban evasion'.
· However, the player claimed they did not create a new account and that it might have taken time for Bungie's security system to update.
· Some speculate that Bungie may have applied a 'Bungie-wide ban' to permanently exclude the player from all Bungie games.
| Category | Content |
|---|---|
| Bungie Terms | A ban in one game does not extend to other games (unless there is a separate violation in that game) |
| Current Situation | Permanent ban in Marathon due to Destiny 2 ban history |
| Controversy | Contradiction between terms and actual application |
| Claim of Ban Evasion | Since Marathon uses Bungie login, accessing with a Destiny 2 banned account is considered ban evasion |
09:12 - 10:15
4. 🤔 Community Questions on Ban Scope and Duration
· The community is actively discussing how far the scope of bans should extend and whether a permanent ban is justified.
· Questions are being raised about whether game bans, like real-world 'statutes of limitations', should have a 'limited period' after which they can be lifted.
· Bungie has the right to create and change rules for its game ecosystem, and even if the terms are clearly stated, it can change rules or apply bans as needed.
· In fact, many creators violate Bungie's terms against using 'Destiny 2' in video titles, and Bungie's inconsistency in applying all its terms further fuels the controversy.
· Questions are being raised about whether game bans, like real-world 'statutes of limitations', should have a 'limited period' after which they can be lifted.
· Bungie has the right to create and change rules for its game ecosystem, and even if the terms are clearly stated, it can change rules or apply bans as needed.
· In fact, many creators violate Bungie's terms against using 'Destiny 2' in video titles, and Bungie's inconsistency in applying all its terms further fuels the controversy.
